[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svn commit: r8530 - branches/1.0.x

From: John Szakmeister <john_at_szakmeister.net>
Date: 2004-02-03 10:52:24 CET

On Tuesday 03 February 2004 02:27, Jostein Chr. Andersen wrote:
> First, this replay is not to Branko alone, it's to everyone. He is just
> saying what many other people seems to think about what's written below:
> [snip]
> > Apart from that, I'm all for merging this to the 1.0 branch. Even if
> > there are still bugs in this version of the installer, they can be no
> > worse than not having wirking installer scripts at all in 1.0, and
> > these changes have no impact on the rest of Subversion.
> For me, this sounds like the installer are next to shit but it's
> tolerable because it's better than nothing (or do I misunderstand
> here?).

I don't think that's what Branko is saying here. I think he's stressing the
importance of having an installer script that we're happy with, and that he's
behind whatever changes you need to make in order to make it happen. FWIW,
on the Windows platform, it's all that I use. I have 8 people using SVN on
Windows at work, and every single one of them use the installer to update
their version of Subversion. I've been very happy with it, and have had no
problems in getting Subversion up and running it.


To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Feb 3 10:53:59 2004

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.