Re: A reply to "Diagnosing SVN"

On Thu, 2004-01-29 at 21:18, Dave Rolsky wrote:
> Care to address why Subversion was written in C in the same document?
> This is actually a serious question.

It doesn't really belong there, since tla (read: Arch) is also written
in C and there was no criticism in "Diagnosing svn" of Subversion having
been written in C.

Subversion was written in C because there is a large pool of skilled C
programmers, because it has an excellent toolset on essentially all
platforms, and because you can make bindings to C code from a wide
variety of languages.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Jan 30 05:26:11 2004