[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: not SVN?

From: Ben Collins-Sussman <sussman_at_collab.net>
Date: 2004-01-27 15:39:42 CET

On Tue, 2004-01-27 at 00:51, Alexander L. Belikoff wrote:

> - someone has to make the step and bite the bullet. Subversion needs exactly
> this last step that would move it into the spotlight as a legitimate
> successor of CVS. Redhat historically has been very brave in biting the
> bullet (glibc, kernel, XFree86, etc) which helped making it a popular and
> stable platform. This should be easier than glibc ;-)

Subversion is targeting a 1.0 release date on Feb 23rd. For many
people, that's going to be the magic number for "trying Subversion" for
the first time.

My recommendation is not to jump into the deep end and "bite the
bullet", but rather dip your toe in the water at first. Set up a pilot
program -- convert one smallish project over to Subversion, and see how
people like it. If it goes well, you can scale up from there.

-Ben, a Subversion developer.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Jan 27 15:40:39 2004

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.