Re: Yet another look at the apr_off_t problem

Greg Hudson <ghudson@MIT.EDU> writes:
> On Fri, 2004-01-23 at 19:51, Tobias Ringström wrote:
> > What I'm
> > saying is that apr should have an autoconf test to find out the size of
> > off_t, and use that size when creating the apr_off_t typedef.
>
> I am okay with that. Karl will like the idea because it means
> Subversion doesn't have to change.

You betcha :-).

And I'm willing to contribute to the "work with APR" part (as an APR
developer, albeit a rather inactive one lately) during Subversion's
soak period.

> Ben still wants to change blame to use a fixed-size type (as a practical
> expedient) and to make svn_filesize_t signed. I will vote for those
> changes, but I won't champion them.

I'll take a look at #1705 (attachment 291) and #1713 right now.

Josander isn't rolling until about 6pm tomorrow night, his time :-).

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat Jan 24 06:21:17 2004