Re: svn commit: r8343 - trunk/subversion/libsvn_ra_svn

Philip Martin wrote:

>Branko Čibej <brane@xbc.nu> writes:
>
>
>>I'd say this is a defect in the standard. According to these two
>>paragraphs, you _cannot_ write portable code that uses signals, and xlc
>>demonstrates this.
>>
>>
>
>6.7.3/4 talking about type qualifiers
>
> "If the same qualifier appears more than once in the same
> specifier-qualifier-list, either directly or via one or more
> typedefs, the behaviour is the same as if it appeared once"
>
>That's the bit that xlc gets wrong. I didn't find that the first time
>I looked (but then I'm not really a language lawyer, I just play at
>the weekend :)
>
>
Oooh, you're right! I wonder if this wording existed in the C90
standard. Anyway, this is a bug to be filed against xlc, not an APR
problem (although realistically, APR can fix it more quickly).

-- 
Brane Čibej   <brane_at_xbc.nu>   http://www.xbc.nu/brane/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org