Re: svn commit: r8343 - trunk/subversion/libsvn_ra_svn

On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 01:30:29PM -0500, Greg Hudson wrote:
> The bitwise operations performed on secret are all xors, so there should
> be no semantic problem with them being (possibly) signed char. So, it's
> mainly an issue of warnings with pickier compilers. Do people think
> that's important enough for a 1.0 pullup?

I thought we treated warnings as bugs? If so it's a bug and if it
doesn't hurt anything might as well do it.

-- 
Ben Reser <ben@reser.org>
http://ben.reser.org
"Conscience is the inner voice which warns us somebody may be looking."
- H.L. Mencken
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org