[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svn commit: r8190 - branches/1.0-stabilization

From: Greg Hudson <ghudson_at_MIT.EDU>
Date: 2004-01-08 21:11:54 CET

On Thu, 2004-01-08 at 13:12, Ben Reser wrote:
> If you consider that a poor attitude I'm sorry you feel that
> way. It's not like I didn't raise the issue to you guys.

Well, I consider it a "poor attitude" the same way I consider that Karl
has a "poor attitude" because he likes to initialize structures with
apr_pcalloc(). :) It's a technical disagreement, not a personal attack.

I think for the packaging materials in our tree, it's better to leave
something broken than apply a workaround, unless that would completely
break the package. (So, for instance, the Apache module install
workaround in packages/redhat-8+ is okay, because I'm presuming you
can't really build RPMs without that. But the book could simply be
omitted until the core build system is fixed to allow building it
without hacks.)

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Jan 8 21:12:48 2004

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.