[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svn commit: r8190 - branches/1.0-stabilization

From: Greg Hudson <ghudson_at_MIT.EDU>
Date: 2004-01-08 21:11:54 CET

On Thu, 2004-01-08 at 13:12, Ben Reser wrote:
> If you consider that a poor attitude I'm sorry you feel that
> way. It's not like I didn't raise the issue to you guys.

Well, I consider it a "poor attitude" the same way I consider that Karl
has a "poor attitude" because he likes to initialize structures with
apr_pcalloc(). :) It's a technical disagreement, not a personal attack.

I think for the packaging materials in our tree, it's better to leave
something broken than apply a workaround, unless that would completely
break the package. (So, for instance, the Apache module install
workaround in packages/redhat-8+ is okay, because I'm presuming you
can't really build RPMs without that. But the book could simply be
omitted until the core build system is fixed to allow building it
without hacks.)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Jan 8 21:12:48 2004

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.