Re: svn commit: r8181 - branches/1.0-stabilization

On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 06:15:14AM -0600, gstein@tigris.org wrote:
> Author: gstein
> Date: Wed Jan 7 06:15:12 2004
> New Revision: 8181
>
> Modified:
> branches/1.0-stabilization/STATUS
> Log:
> more votes. fix strength of some prior votes. a bit o' formatting.
>
> Modified: branches/1.0-stabilization/STATUS
> ==============================================================================
> --- branches/1.0-stabilization/STATUS (original)
> +++ branches/1.0-stabilization/STATUS Wed Jan 7 06:15:12 2004

[snip]

> @@ -370,6 +371,7 @@
> Justification: Obvious doc string typo, no risk.
> Votes:
> +1: kfogel, jerenkrantz, jszakmeister
> + +1 (concept): gstein

I'm a bit confused. How can you be +1 (concept) on a single line typo
fix in the documentation? Either the fix is correct and should be done
or it is wrong and shouldn't be done. Or you just don't care which
would be +0 or -0. My understanding is +1 (concept) means you're okay
with the idea but not necessarily the implementation.

-- 
Ben Reser <ben@reser.org>
http://ben.reser.org
"Conscience is the inner voice which warns us somebody may be looking."
- H.L. Mencken
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org