[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svn commit: r8181 - branches/1.0-stabilization

From: Ben Reser <ben_at_reser.org>
Date: 2004-01-08 01:23:36 CET

On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 06:15:14AM -0600, gstein@tigris.org wrote:
> Author: gstein
> Date: Wed Jan 7 06:15:12 2004
> New Revision: 8181
>
> Modified:
> branches/1.0-stabilization/STATUS
> Log:
> more votes. fix strength of some prior votes. a bit o' formatting.
>
> Modified: branches/1.0-stabilization/STATUS
> ==============================================================================
> --- branches/1.0-stabilization/STATUS (original)
> +++ branches/1.0-stabilization/STATUS Wed Jan 7 06:15:12 2004

[snip]

> @@ -370,6 +371,7 @@
> Justification: Obvious doc string typo, no risk.
> Votes:
> +1: kfogel, jerenkrantz, jszakmeister
> + +1 (concept): gstein

I'm a bit confused. How can you be +1 (concept) on a single line typo
fix in the documentation? Either the fix is correct and should be done
or it is wrong and shouldn't be done. Or you just don't care which
would be +0 or -0. My understanding is +1 (concept) means you're okay
with the idea but not necessarily the implementation.

-- 
Ben Reser <ben@reser.org>
http://ben.reser.org
"Conscience is the inner voice which warns us somebody may be looking."
- H.L. Mencken
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Jan 8 01:24:09 2004

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.