kfogel@collab.net wrote:
>David Summers <david@summersoft.fay.ar.us> writes:
>
>
>>Does this mean the dist process should take out the www directory and
>>sub-directories before the tarball is rolled?
>>
>>Not a big deal. It's just nice to include accurate information if you
>>are going to include the information. :-)
>>
>>
>
>We could have the dist process take out the pages that don't matter
>for a dist, and leave the ones that do (such as the FAQ).
>
>However, I'm loathe to fiddle with dist.sh any more than necessary
>before 1.0. Why ask for trouble? Let's make this improvement *after*
>1.0 comes out. It's not the end of the world to have a slightly
>outdated www area. Hardly anyone's going to look there, especially
>since our primary documentation is not located there.
>
>
OK, Should I file an issue about it so it doesn't get forgotten?
- David
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Jan 6 22:43:22 2004