Re: svn commit: r8170 - branches/1.0-stabilization

David Summers <david@summersoft.fay.ar.us> writes:
> Does this mean the dist process should take out the www directory and
> sub-directories before the tarball is rolled?
>
> Not a big deal. It's just nice to include accurate information if you
> are going to include the information. :-)

We could have the dist process take out the pages that don't matter
for a dist, and leave the ones that do (such as the FAQ).

However, I'm loathe to fiddle with dist.sh any more than necessary
before 1.0. Why ask for trouble? Let's make this improvement *after*
1.0 comes out. It's not the end of the world to have a slightly
outdated www area. Hardly anyone's going to look there, especially
since our primary documentation is not located there.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Jan 6 22:25:04 2004