Re: RFC: date parser strawman

Colin Watson wrote:
> I'd been under the impression that YYYY/MM/DD was a commonly used date
> format in Japan, but I could be wrong there. Nevertheless, it's
> unambiguous so seems safe to support; I've never heard of anyone using
> YYYY/DD/MM. I often use YYYY/MM/DD because I like the freedom from
> ambiguity but sometimes forget exactly what the ISO separator is.

In which case it would be better to remember that it is "-" once and
stop inventing new formats :-).

Julian

-- 
<green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org