Re: Expected post-1.0 release cycle?

--On Tuesday, December 23, 2003 8:27 PM -0500 Greg Hudson <ghudson@MIT.EDU>
wrote:

> I'm still thinking once a year for new minor releases is about right,
> but maybe more "in the steady state" than "right away". So we'd have
> 1.1 closer to next July than next December, but 1.5 and 1.6 would be
> spaced more like a year apart, assuming we've had no cause to jump to
> 2.0 by then.

Yes, as I think the 1.x tree stabilizes, we'll be able to space it out more.
Initially, at the outset, I'd expect we might have to do one or two patch
releases to 1.0 immediately to fix some 'brown-paper bag' bugs. Then, we'd go
3-6 months taking feedback and making what changes we can and then produce a
new minor rev that addresses the 'biggest' concerns about 1.0 as 1.1. Then,
we'll have to see how it plays out from there. My crystal ball doesn't go out
that far. ;-) -- justin

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Dec 24 02:43:34 2003