[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Expected post-1.0 release cycle?

From: Greg Hudson <ghudson_at_MIT.EDU>
Date: 2003-12-24 02:27:56 CET

On Tue, 2003-12-23 at 20:20, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> > In your world, I guess we might have released (let's assume even/odd
> > here, since it's your world) svn 1.2.0, svn 1.4.0, and svn 1.6.0 by
> > then, and 1.6.x is the only release we'll make bugfixes to.

> No, that's not what I said. I said 3-6 months for a minor release would be
> reasonable.

Huh. Sorry about that; I guess I misread. (And, we just crossed wires,
so take my most recent message to John Peacock as being based on the
same misconception.)

I'm still thinking once a year for new minor releases is about right,
but maybe more "in the steady state" than "right away". So we'd have
1.1 closer to next July than next December, but 1.5 and 1.6 would be
spaced more like a year apart, assuming we've had no cause to jump to
2.0 by then.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Dec 24 02:28:28 2003

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.