Re: process for including changes in 1.0

--On Monday, December 15, 2003 8:38 PM +0100 Tobias Ringström
<tobias@ringstrom.mine.nu> wrote:

> It would be nice to include an exception for harmless obviously correct
> fixes such as spelling fixes and most documentation fixes.

I'll just chime in and say that I think that's a bad idea. It should require
3 +1s across the board.

The gray area of what is 'obviously' correct between you and I are probably
very different. If it's *that* obvious, then it should be easy to get the 3
+1s. Remember we're talking about the 1.0 branch, not the trunk. I don't
think it's especially urgent to get the 'obviously correct fixes' in - IMHO,
it's more important to make sure that we follow a standardized process. --
justin

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Dec 16 08:35:43 2003