> -----Original Message-----
> From: John Peacock [mailto:jpeacock@rowman.com]
> Sent: Friday, December 05, 2003 9:49 AM
> To: Kevin Pilch-Bisson
> Cc: dev@subversion.tigris.org
> Subject: Re: 0.35 => Beta => 1.0 schedule
>
> Kevin Pilch-Bisson wrote:
>
> > Why don't we have:
> > * released versions with version numbers.
> > * snapshot releases, with just a datestamp or a revision number.
> >
> > So you would have subversion-1.0.tar.gz, and
> > subversion-unstable-r12860.tar.gz
> >
> > I think this scheme avoids the confusion about version numbers, and
> makes it
> > clear that this is an unstable release?
> >
>
> What does 'svn version' report in the unstable snapshots? This also
> doesn't
> help packagers at all (since they may have different rules to play by).
>
Svn version can say "svn, version snapshot (r12860)"
Packagers can then have svn packages, and svn-snapshot packagers. People
who want the bleeding edge can go look for the -snapshot packages.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Dec 5 19:03:26 2003