Re: 0.35 => Beta => 1.0 schedule

Kevin Pilch-Bisson wrote:

> Why don't we have:
> * released versions with version numbers.
> * snapshot releases, with just a datestamp or a revision number.
>
> So you would have subversion-1.0.tar.gz, and
> subversion-unstable-r12860.tar.gz
>
> I think this scheme avoids the confusion about version numbers, and makes it
> clear that this is an unstable release?
>

What does 'svn version' report in the unstable snapshots? This also doesn't
help packagers at all (since they may have different rules to play by).

John

-- 
John Peacock
Director of Information Research and Technology
Rowman & Littlefield Publishing Group
4501 Forbes Boulevard
Suite H
Lanham, MD  20706
301-459-3366 x.5010
fax 301-429-5748
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org