Re: 0.35 => Beta => 1.0 schedule

Jani Averbach wrote:
> On 2003-12-04 18:08-0600, kfogel@collab.net wrote:
>
>>Regarding that other topic, numbering schemes:
[...]
> However, may I introduce my own proposal? =)
[...]
> So, I propose that the "dev" will prefix release number, in that way
> the first thing that will hit your brains is that this is "dev",
> after that you will find out the release number, package format, etc..
>
> subversion-dev-1.1.0.tar.gz, subversion-dev-1.1.0.rpm...

Unfortunately the form "subversion-devel-1.1.0.rpm" is already taken to mean a package of libraries, header files, etc., that enables the user to develop software that links to Subversion. (And no, you can't argue that "dev" is different from "devel". :-)

- Julian

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Dec 5 14:48:22 2003