Re: 0.35 => Beta => 1.0 schedule

"Brian W. Fitzpatrick" <fitz@red-bean.com> writes:

> OK, so how about if we stick to the even/odd convention, plus we
> include either the string 'dev' or 'unstable' in development releases?
>
> subversion-1.1.32-dev.tar.gz
> or
> subversion-1.1.32-unstable.tar.gz
>
> as opposed to stable releases:
>
> subversion-1.0.87.tar.gz
>
> Does that seem like a reasonable compromise?

I was going to suggest just that, even going as far as teaching
dist.sh to Do The Right Thing in svn_version.h and in the name of the
tarball based on the minor version number.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Dec 5 00:46:36 2003