[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: 0.35 => Beta => 1.0 schedule

From: Brian W. Fitzpatrick <fitz_at_red-bean.com>
Date: 2003-12-05 00:41:25 CET

On Dec 4, 2003, at 3:22 PM, Branko Čibej wrote:

> Brian W. Fitzpatrick wrote:
>> Normal users shouldn't ever even be aware of development
>> (odd-numbered) releases--I mean, when's the last time that you went
>> and "accidentally" grabbed a 2.5 release of the Linux kernel because
>> you saw that 2.5.x is higher than 2.4.x?
> Um. there's a world of difference between the Linux kernel and
> Subversion. For one thing, far more people are likely to grab a new
> Subversion release.

OK, so how about if we stick to the even/odd convention, plus we
include either the string 'dev' or 'unstable' in development releases?


as opposed to stable releases:


Does that seem like a reasonable compromise?


To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Dec 5 00:42:22 2003

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.