Re: client performance comparison cvs - svn on windows?

solo turn wrote:
> hi,
>
> has anybody experience with performance of cvs vs. svn client on windows?
>
> our impression is that svn-client performance on unix/linux is quite ok, but on windows it feels
> somehow slow (maybe caused by the fact, that windows filesystem does not handle a lot of small
> files very well?).
>
> but nobody of us has comparative numbers with cvs ...
>

SVN runs slightly slower on Windows across the board, but the most significant
problem that I've noticed is that using the svn+ssh to access the repository.

http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1204

The last time I ran a comparison, I compared the FAT32 performance on Linux 2.4
vs FAT32 on Windows 2000 and found that Windows was roughly 30% slower across
the board for all operations that examine the working copy. Of course, the last
time I ran this test was over a year ago and the results could be extremely
different now.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Dec 2 05:35:31 2003