[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: CHANGES: Suggestion

From: Jostein Chr. Andersen <jostein_at_josander.net>
Date: 2003-11-28 07:46:20 CET

On Friday 28 November 2003 05.40, p.lussier@comcast.net wrote:
> (also, the rev number was usually "guessed at" in most cases, and
> there were a couple of times I committed with one rev number in the
> CHANGES file, then had to immediately change it and recommit because
> someone else beat me to the number I had "guessed" :)
> I'm +1 on losing that rev number, it was far more hassle than it was
> worth :)

I did not know this, but I guessed that things was done that way, wich is
bad (and not your fault) :-), thanks for telling this.
Time to look at the dist.sh script..

A posting about this - written by Justin, just camed up when I'm writing
this. I agree with what he says 100%. As he say: "I think it should be
the revnum of when it was branched off from trunk."


Jostein Chr. Andersen <jostein@josander.net>
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Nov 28 07:50:47 2003

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.