Re: 0.33 == Beta

On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 10:43:44AM -0600, Ben Collins-Sussman wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-11-12 at 09:51, kfogel@collab.net wrote:
> > Ben Collins-Sussman <sussman@collab.net> writes:
> > > But wasn't the last schema bug discovered by a non-developer? I mean,
> > > the history bug came out a normal user's repository, right?
> > >
> > > In my mind, that's an argument for distributing the new fs-schema change
> > > in 0.33, so that the schema change gets as much testing as possible
> > > before a 0.34 "beta" release.
> >
> > That's exactly what I was thinking too. If we drop one of these
> > merges from 0.33, better to delay #1429 than #1578.
>
> I really don't see why we should drop any merges. Who said 0.33 has to
> be "perfectly" stable?

The release, in general, doesn't have to be perfectly stable. But the
*repository* *does*.

Cheers,
-g

-- 
Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org