[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: 0.33 == Beta

From: Ben Collins-Sussman <sussman_at_collab.net>
Date: 2003-11-12 17:43:44 CET

On Wed, 2003-11-12 at 09:51, kfogel@collab.net wrote:
> Ben Collins-Sussman <sussman@collab.net> writes:
> > But wasn't the last schema bug discovered by a non-developer? I mean,
> > the history bug came out a normal user's repository, right?
> >
> > In my mind, that's an argument for distributing the new fs-schema change
> > in 0.33, so that the schema change gets as much testing as possible
> > before a 0.34 "beta" release.
> That's exactly what I was thinking too. If we drop one of these
> merges from 0.33, better to delay #1429 than #1578.

I really don't see why we should drop any merges. Who said 0.33 has to
be "perfectly" stable? It's 0.34 that needs to be stable, not 0.33.
And the best way to make 0.34 stable is to expose all the "large" 0.33
changes to as many people as possible.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Nov 12 17:44:39 2003

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.