Re: Unexpected output from "svn log"

"C. Michael Pilato" <cmpilato@collab.net> writes:
> Sorry, Karl, you're absolutely wrong on this. Yes, for a URL, HEAD is
> chosen, but for a working copy path, it's BASE.

Uh, I did test this before I ran it.

I ran 'svn log' in a working copy, and it generated a log to r7646,
yet no item in the working copy was higher than r7628.

If 'svn log' expands, via the implicit-dot rule, to 'svn log .', then
I was running it on a working copy path, and getting HEAD not BASE.

Like I said in my original mail to Brane, "try it" :-).

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Nov 6 17:23:22 2003