Re: --rev-prop or --revprop?

On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 04:02:47AM +0000, Julian Foad wrote:
> Greg Stein wrote:
>...
> >>On Oct 27, 2003, at 8:25 PM, kfogel@collab.net wrote:
> >>
> >>>I like the consistency and intuitiveness of "--revprop", because it
> >>>treats 'revprop' as a single compound noun. Others find this neither
>...
> > Agreed. Same here.
>
> I suspect that what both of you really mean is that "revprop" is more
> familiar to you, rather than more sensible. But nevertheless you don't
> want it changed so I will leave it alone.

That is quite possible; I certainly won't discount that. But whether it is
due to bias or not, I still have the opinion that I like "revprop" better
than "rev-prop" :-)

*shrug*

I don't really know a good way to talk about it and eliminate the bias. We
could poll a bazillion users, but it would take a bit to explain the
concept, so I'd doubt that we would have any valuable feedback that way.
So I think we have to deal with what we have :-)

Cheers,
-g

-- 
Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org