Branko Čibej wrote:
>Michael Wood wrote:
>
>
>
>>On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 09:55:25AM -0500, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>"C. Michael Pilato" <cmpilato@collab.net> writes:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>Yep, it's a bug in the loader code. This is now my highest priority
>>>>issue.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>See revision 7273. And thanks for the excellent report and recipe.
>>>Your extra few minutes of effort probably saved me an hour of work.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>Glad I could help.
>>
>>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>rev 7273: cmpilato | 2003-10-02 16:51:47 +0200 (Thu, 02 Oct 2003) | 6 lines
>>Changed paths:
>> M /trunk/subversion/libsvn_repos/load.c
>>
>>* subversion/libsvn_repos/load.c
>> (parse_property_block): Geez. Undo what appears to be an accidental
>> removal of some crucial code by Brane back in revision 5476. Did
>> somebody resolve a conflict the wrong way? This re-fixes the bug
>> addressed originally by Sussman back in revision 5420.
>>
>>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>>
>>
>Aaargh! I actually did that! I couldn've sworn I wen't through the diffs
>with a fine comb several times before I committed...
>
>/me off to find a hole to hide in
>
>
>
>
What impact (if any) does this have on repositories up to 7273?
The reason I'm asking is because I've got a server at subversion-0.27.0
that I'm getting ready to update to 0.30.0 and would like to know if I'm
going to run into any problems when I do the dump 0.27.0 / restore 0.30?
Thanks,
- David Summers
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Oct 3 20:53:59 2003