[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Size vs Focus WAS RE: ".svn" directory name no good....

From: Justin Erenkrantz <justin_at_erenkrantz.com>
Date: 2003-09-26 19:10:33 CEST

--On Friday, September 26, 2003 12:05:14 -0500 "C. Michael Pilato"
<cmpilato@collab.net> wrote:

> This could be done compatibly -- working copies also have versions, ya
> know.

But, those versions only reside in the admin dir - that means you still
have double reservation problem. Also, not prefixing it by some characters
means that the admin directory appears in the regular listing - one thing
I've liked about the .svn name (additionally, the .svn means that it isn't
displayed usually anyway on Unix boxen).

The more I think about it, also supporting '_svn' doesn't seem *that* bad.
I certainly like it more than the other options presented. -- justin

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Sep 26 19:11:28 2003

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.