Mark Grosberg <mark@nolab.conman.org> writes:
> No (for the moment all my "wierd" architectures are in a state of
> disrepair). However, I figured I would point it out and at least prevent
> N+1 instances. Technically, to be portable, that assumption eventually
> needs to be changed though. I know, not exactly pre-1.0 issues, but
> nevertheless maybe it should be filed in the issue tracker as a
> long-standing cleanup project for post-1.0.
I think we should wait until someone encounters the bug in the wild --
that is, they're able to build all of Subversion's prerequisites on
architecture X, but not Subversion itself, because of this assumption
in our code. _Then_ we have a bug to file :-).
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Sep 19 23:09:09 2003