Looking at the patch, I wonder if it is the right place to do the
check. Can someone more qualified comment?
On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 10:17:18PM +0300, Jani Averbach wrote:
>
> Sorry for posting off/miss-thread, and not following this thread very
> closely, but how this compares to current topic?
>
> http://www.contactor.se/~dast/svn/archive-2003-08/1310.shtml
>
> From: tobias_at_ringstrom.mine.nu
> Subject: [PATCH] Unifying and fixing the error handling for ra_local and
> svnserve
>
> It later turned out to be a permission/umask problem. With the enclosed
> patch, the output looks like this instead:
>
> svn: Couldn't find a repository
> svn: No repository found in 'svn://localhost/home/svn/trunk'
> svn: Berkeley DB error
> svn: Berkeley DB error while opening environment for filesystem
> /home/svn/db:
> Permission denied
>
>
> This patch has been applied:
> http://www.contactor.se/~dast/svn/archive-2003-08/1357.shtml
>
>
> BR, Jani
>
> --
> Jani Averbach
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Sep 5 21:35:48 2003