[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Pressing need for exclusive locking

From: Ben Collins-Sussman <sussman_at_collab.net>
Date: 2003-09-03 22:55:10 CEST

"Ronald Cannes" <roncannes@hotmail.com> writes:

> >I was just discouraging people from arguing about whether locks should
> >be breakable or not, that's all. :-)
>
> Ahh, I see. And by the way, locks should NOT be breakable :-)

Deathmatch! You and me, in the ring! :-)

> > It's not that anyone is against lease-based locking, we're just not
> > thinking
> >about locking at all right now. We're closing 1.0 bugs.
>
> I understand. Any chance 1.0 will be out before, say medio 2004? Just
> to get a rough idea.

We're working hard to get 1.0 out before xmas. Check the issue
tracker to follow along.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Sep 3 22:57:06 2003

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.