Re: Pressing need for exclusive locking

> > >But rather than debate this -- look at the locking-plan.txt. It's
> > >modeled after the DAV lock specification, which allows both kinds of
> > >locks.
> >
> > Since you discourage further discussion I assume there has already
> > been made a decision on how this is going to be solved?
>
>I was just discouraging people from arguing about whether locks should
>be breakable or not, that's all. :-)

Ahh, I see. And by the way, locks should NOT be breakable :-)

>It's not that anyone is against lease-based locking, we're just not
>thinking
>about locking at all right now. We're closing 1.0 bugs.

I understand. Any chance 1.0 will be out before, say medio 2004? Just to get
a rough idea.

_________________________________________________________________
Hotmail snakker ditt språk!
http://www.hotmail.msn.com/cgi-bin/sbox?rru=dasp/lang.asp - Få Hotmail på
norsk i dag

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Sep 3 22:48:51 2003