Re: FreeBSD: 0.26 extremely unstable - SOLVED

In a message dated: Wed, 20 Aug 2003 21:22:52 EDT
Garrett Rooney said:

>pll@lanminds.com wrote:
>>
>> This would seem to imply why it is a good idea to use the http:
>> method, no?
>
>perhaps, but svn+ssh:// is faster, uses existing ssh infrastructure, and
>is a lot easier to set up, so as with all things you have to consider
>the various options and decide which one gives you something you can
>live with.

Hmm. I s'pose, though if you end up having to hack a wrapper script
to get that to work, then have to fight with getting groups and
permissions working properly (after you've diagnosed that problem),
it seems that just setting up http: is less effort.

Unless your point is that in the long run the performance gain
svn+ssh gives you will put significantly further ahead. In which
case, it's probably worth it :)

-- 
Seeya,
Paul
--
Key fingerprint = 1660 FECC 5D21 D286 F853  E808 BB07 9239 53F1 28EE
	It may look like I'm just sitting here doing nothing,
   but I'm really actively waiting for all my problems to go away.
	 If you're not having fun, you're not doing it right!
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org