kfogel@collab.net wrote:
>Great, thanks! For reviewing, exactly which revisions need to be
>looked at? Is it just
>
> 6721, 6722, and 6794
>
Yes, please!
>(i.e., those are the ones that will eventually be merged into trunk)?
>
>Since we're now fairly close to 0.28's release, I'd like move this
>issue into 0.29, and merge to trunk only after the other 0.28 issues
>are done (so we have one clean revision from which to branch the
>release). Fortunately, this gives David Waite time to finish SSL
>support on the branch anyway.
>
OK.
>I think there's no need to "refresh" the branch with the recent trunk
>changes, because the work that's been happening in trunk is unlikely
>to interfere with anything David needs to do. So the recipe now is
>just a one-stepper:
>
> 1. Leave the branch in place, tell David that it's ready for him to
> add SSL support. That's all :-).
>
David, please consider yourself notified ;-D.
>When he's done, we'll merge exactly the revisions above + David's new
>revisions from branch to trunk, and enable Neon 0.24, and hopefully
>still have enough time for testing before SVN 0.29 is due.
>
>Sound good?
>
Sure. Thanks!
Sergey.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Aug 19 21:05:31 2003