Re: [PATCH] Issue #1074: Need a svnadmin command to verify that the repository is not corrupted (Take 2)

On Wednesday 06 August 2003 15:00, cmpilato@collab.net wrote:
[snip]
> kfogel@collab.net writes:
> > Cool implementation!
> >
> > But if the purpose of the command is to check integrity, then let's
> > have its name reflect that. It may be 'dump --dry-run' under the
> > hood, but 'svnadmin verify' or something is a more accurate name for
> > what it does.
>
> Oh, +1. Good thought, Captain UI.
>
> John: go for it, and if that means starting 4 days from now ... well,
> I know *I* have plenty of other fish to fry in the meantime. :-)

So should I implement both the option and the subcommand, or just the
subcommand then? I'm personally leaning towards just the subcommand.

I'll get to work on it soon... I'm still trying to catch up from my 2 days off
of work. :-)

-John

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Aug 15 02:12:37 2003