kfogel@collab.net wrote:
>cmpilato@collab.net writes:
>
>
>>I don't want us to claim support for neon 0.24 if we have to add an
>>disclaimer that "Oh, but something that currently works if you are
>>using 0.23.9 won't work if you upgrade." David's new functionality
>>can come in any time he sees fit to add it. But I think we should at
>>least avoid *losing* functionality for people who upgrade to Neon
>>0.24.
>>
>>
>
>+1
>
>Sergey, if you want to merge just so you can get a clean rebranch,
>that's fine. Just make sure that the 0.24 side gets disabled somehow
>(in the configury check maybe?), so that trunk Subversion remains
>formally incompatible with Neon 0.24. This way will be least
>confusing for users.
>
Done. Or should I say, nothing has been done to enable Neon 0.24 support
on the trunk :-)?
>When we announce anything about Neon 0.24, it should be that we are
>completely upgraded and that everything works at least as well as it
>did before, if not better.
>
>-Karl
>
>
Sure :-). Next version must not be worse than the previous ;-).
Received on Tue Aug 12 20:19:17 2003