Actually, what I meant by this is 'make sure you don't break https
support for users of trunk'. I didn't mean that it should work with
0.24, just that it should still work for 0.23.x ;-)
-David Waite
Sergey A. Lipnevich wrote:
> Ben Collins-Sussman wrote:
>
>> I understand that Sergey's XML changes allow svn to be compatible with
>> either neon-0.23 or -0.24. But is it even *possible* to have SSL code
>> that works with both versions of neon? And if David's too busy, will
>> Sergey make that happen?
>
>
> Technically, I don't think it's "impossible" :-), but the general
> opinion seems to be that it's "unnecessary". MBK identified two short
> pieces of code that don't work with Neon 0.24, they're simply omitted
> for 0.24 right now. Will I make them work? Probably not before David
> can start (and a long time after that, I never programmed for SSL/TLS
> before), but I'll look into this for fun and experience :-). Also, I
> can try and make current Subversion work with Neon 0.24 SSL abtraction
> API, but I certainly will not be able to add features that David wants
> to add, in a relatively short timeframe.
>
> Sergey.
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Aug 12 19:49:19 2003