Re: request for comments from developers about issues 1004 and 901

----- Original Message -----
From: <kfogel@collab.net>
>
> I think the reason you're not getting much feedback is that the issue
> is listed as "Post-1.0". This is because we (or at least I) felt the

In most issues marked as post-1.0 you usually post "a patch earlier
than 1.0 will be most welcome, of course".
But to make patches, some discussion is needed first.

> effort required to solve the issue was not worth the benefit at this
> time. If there were no pressure to stabilize and release 1.0, things
> might be different.

Does that mean that everything marked as post-1.0 won't be
accepted or discussed about?

> By the way, I don't see in the history of issue 901 where it "got
> closed". Issue 1004 was closed, but as you say, that was about
> cancellation checking, not progress reporting. But issue 901 looks
> like it's still new (i.e., just opened, not "reopened").

Sorry, mixed up the issue numbers. And issue 1004 wasn't just
about the cancellation if you read the opening message of the issue.

Stefan

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Aug 11 18:03:30 2003