On Tue, 2003-08-05 at 15:37, Jack Repenning wrote:
> At 3:00 PM -0700 8/5/03, John Locke wrote:
> >I think this is a very neat solution (redirecting to the correct
> >version), and what is particularly nice about it is that (a) can be done
> >(I think) without any changes to Subversion whatsoever, using an Apache
> >mod_rewrite rule.
>
> This seems like a *dis*advantage to me. It complicates the
> webmeister's life. Some will do it, some won't bother, some will
> take it as inspiration to do something even more cleverer. Chaos!
> Anarchy! Just the sort of "needless creativity" architecture is
> meant to forestall.
Yeah, you're right. Better to implement in Subversion.
But... here's another suggestion:
If this group decides upon a standard, and PUBLISHES it to the web site
as THE CORRECT URL SCHEME to use to access versions in the repository,
actual implementation could be put off until later--people could then go
ahead and build client applications to use the defined standard, and use
Apache rewriting to get them to work until they're implemented in
Subversion.
Cheers,
John
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Aug 6 01:03:52 2003