It seems that my emails are gotting lost... so here I try for the last time.
I would like to submit a patch to "svnadmin archive" command and its
underlying implementation in fs.c.
I. Enhancements:
----------------------------------------------------------
A). Add two new parameters to svn_fs_berkeley_archive to look as follows:
/** Set @a *logfiles to array of <tt>const char *</tt> logfile paths
* of Berkeley DB-based Subversion filesystem.
*
* @a absolute_paths specifies format of the paths:
* TRUE - Paths are to be absolute
* FALSE - Paths are to be relative to the Berkeley DB logs directory.
*
* @a all_log_files specifies which logs to include in the list:
* TRUE - All logs are included
* FALSE - Only unused logs are included
*
* This function wraps the same Berkeley DB 'log_archive' function
* called by the db_archive binary. Repository administrators may
* want to run this function periodically and delete the unused log
* files, as a way of reclaiming disk space.
*/
svn_error_t *svn_fs_berkeley_archive (apr_array_header_t **logfiles,
const char *path,
svn_boolean_t absolute_paths,
svn_boolean_t all_log_files,
apr_pool_t *pool);
B) Modify svnadmin's main.c to allow expose the new API to the end user.
II. Questions that came up:
----------------------------------------------------------
A). Name of the "archive" command.
As Michael Wood pointed out that "archive" is not the best name to
describe the command that lists Berkeley DB log files.
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.subversion.devel/31809
* How does "svnadmin dbloglist [--all]" sound?
* If command is renamed does svn_fs_berkeley_archive get renamed
as well or a new function is created (e.g. svn_fs_berkeley_loglist) and
svn_fs_berkeley_archive calls the new function so that any existing code
works without a change.?
B). Need for absolute_paths parameter.
cmpilato@collab.net said: "I don't really see the need to have the
abs-vs.-rel path parameter", referring to absolute_paths parameter.
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.subversion.devel/31725
* Given that I also want to submit a patch for "svnadmin copy"
(hot copy) command that will need log file names only, is that a reason
enough to keep that parameter? You can read about why I wish to compare
log files at
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.subversion.devel/31740
I await your comments.
Sincerely,
Vladimir Berezniker
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Aug 5 21:10:02 2003