Garrett Rooney wrote:
>
> kfogel@collab.net wrote:
>
> > The svn_load_dirs problem is unfortunate, but on the other hand, we
> > don't really consider the stuff in tools/ to be part of the core
> > product (at least as far as developer group endorsement goes!). It's
> > contributed stuff that we include in our distribution solely to make
> > things more convenient. Perhaps we need to make this clearer, though?
> >
> > (It's also possible that svn_load_dirs is slow because of some
> > underlying problem in Subversion. If so, it would be nice to get some
> > demonstration of that. I don't know svn_load_dirs's algorithm, so
> > can't say off the top of my head.)
>
> With regard to svn_load_dirs.pl, if we're not going to support it, we
> shouldn't be mentioning it in the book. That said, there is a TODO
> somewhere to rewrite the section of the book on vendor branches, and I
> think Mike said something about just not mentioning svn_load_dirs.pl at all.
Well, I vote to support it since I wrote it, but I guess that means
I'll have to put some more energy into it :) which I can make time for
:)
I think the script can be made more efficient, or at least take some
additional command line options to skip consistency checks that will
speed up the script.
Best,
Blair
--
Blair Zajac <blair@orcaware.com>
Plots of your system's performance - http://www.orcaware.com/orca/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Jul 31 19:48:25 2003