Re: "svn resolve" becomes "svn resolved"
From: Julian Foad <julianfoad_at_btopenworld.com>
Date: 2003-07-29 16:03:59 CEST
Wolf Josef wrote:
It would certainly be handy in some common situations. However it is not a tidy and general solution: not all conflicts can or should be resolved by a bit of editing in an editor - e.g. binary files; property conflicts. So the feature would have dangling edge cases and switches and options to tell it what to do. I don't like any of these cases where "svn" launches your editor, even though I agree that they are handy in certain situations.
So we want a handy way to resolve a batch of text conflicts but I don't want "svn" to do it. I hate to mention scripts again because it has connotations of "Do It Yourself" but I think we should make an effort to get some scripts for features like this one into the core distribution of "svn" so that people recognise that they are a valid and documented part of the package, not "DIY".
> Renaming to "resolved" would lead to confusion if above mentioned
It would only lead to confusion if that feature were implemented under the name "svn resolved". It could still be implimented later under a different name such as "svn resolve".
- Julian
---------------------------------------------------------------------
|
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.