RE: "svn resolve" becomes "svn resolved"

Ben Collins-Sussman wrote:

> > > Lots of people agreed that "svn resolve" should change to "svn
> > > resolved" to better reflect its meaning and reduce
> > > confusion (thread "'svn revert' vs. 'svn resolve'"). Some
> > > people proposed additional changes, which I am not discussing
> > > here.

Named thread had another proposal: let "svn resolve" (or "svn foobar",
after renaming it) fire up your editor with all the conflicting files
in it. I think such a feature would be very nice because finding all
the conflicting files and editing/"svn resolving" them one by one
results in veeery much monotone typing.

> > No objections here. In fact, every time I use the command I'm
> > suprised that we haven't made this change yet.
>
> +1 .... do it, man, do it!

Renaming to "resolved" would lead to confusion if above mentioned
feature would be added at some time in the future. Do you really
want to close the door for it?

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Jul 29 13:25:13 2003