[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Subversion 0.25.0 released

From: Blair Zajac <blair_at_orcaware.com>
Date: 2003-07-11 02:18:57 CEST

pll@lanminds.com wrote:
>
> In a message dated: Thu, 10 Jul 2003 14:02:02 PDT
> Blair Zajac said:
>
> >Hi Paul,
> >
> >Great first release!
>
> Thanks! I couldn't have done it without a lot of help from everyone
> here though. Thank yourselves for being so patient and helpful :)
>
> >The only minor nit I have regarding this is the filename of the tar.gz.
> >We've been recently placing the .0 in the filename of the tar.gz
>
> Yeah, you know, I got a little confused about that. Looking at
> /tags the only 3 digit names are point releases like 0.24.2. All the
> .0 releases are just 0.XY, like 0.25.

Yes, I also saw that inconsistency.

The /tags are the only consistent place where the .0 is dropped.

>
> When looking at dist.sh, it states:
>
> # For example, the command line:
> #
> # ./dist.sh 0.24.2 6284
> #
> # from the top-level of a branches/release-0.24.2 working copy will
> # create the 0.24.2 release tarball.
>
> So, I probably should have run ./dist.sh 0.25.0, but for some reason
> I didn't. I don't know why. I think I thought this rev should also
> match the tag name for some reason.

We can always rename the tags in /tags, to get everything consistent.

Best,
Blair

-- 
Blair Zajac <blair@orcaware.com>
Plots of your system's performance - http://www.orcaware.com/orca/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Jul 11 02:19:53 2003

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.