[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: [PATCH] "svn commit" performance

From: Chia-liang Kao <clkao_at_clkao.org>
Date: 2003-07-10 18:44:17 CEST

On Thu, Jul 10, 2003 at 04:13:54PM +0100, Philip Martin wrote:
> > + SVN_ERR (svn_wc_adm_probe_try (&parent_access, associated,
> > + parent, FALSE, FALSE, pool));
> No, don't use the probe functions, just use the information in the
> entries, call apr_hash_get to see if access batons exist, and call
> do_open to open any missing access batons.

the problem (and the sort) here is that if foo/bar/baz is locked first,
subsequent tree locking of foo/bar would fail since baz is already locked.
or am i'm missing something in the wc api?

and thanks for reviewing! i'll fix the rest later.


To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Jul 10 18:45:11 2003

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.