On Wed, 9 Jul 2003 brane@xbc.nu wrote:
> Quoting Evan Easton <evan@eeaston.com>:
>
> > I'd love it if the python bindings were bundled...
>
> Python bindings? Sure, no problem; they build on Windows, and they (presumably)
> work on Windows. Er. Which version of Python did you have in mind, by the way?
>
> Because the trouble is that bindings built for Python 2.2 won't work wirh Pyton
> 2.1, or any other version, at least on Windows -- because the names of the
> Python DLLs change between versions.
>
> I can build the bindings for Python 2.2, which is what I currently have
> installed, but I can't build the bindings for five different Python versions. Sorry.
To keep things as simple as possible binding for Python 2.2 would be just
fine with me. It is the latest stable version at the moment and I believe
the intention is to maintain this version even after Python 2.3 is relased
next month.
Waldemar
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Jul 10 01:11:49 2003