osuchw@freenet.edmonton.ab.ca wrote:
>On Wed, 9 Jul 2003 brane@xbc.nu wrote:
>
>
>
>>Quoting Evan Easton <evan@eeaston.com>:
>>
>>
>>
>>>I'd love it if the python bindings were bundled...
>>>
>>>
>>Python bindings? Sure, no problem; they build on Windows, and they (presumably)
>>work on Windows. Er. Which version of Python did you have in mind, by the way?
>>
>>Because the trouble is that bindings built for Python 2.2 won't work wirh Pyton
>>2.1, or any other version, at least on Windows -- because the names of the
>>Python DLLs change between versions.
>>
>>I can build the bindings for Python 2.2, which is what I currently have
>>installed, but I can't build the bindings for five different Python versions. Sorry.
>>
>>
>
>To keep things as simple as possible binding for Python 2.2 would be just
>fine with me. It is the latest stable version at the moment and I believe
>the intention is to maintain this version even after Python 2.3 is relased
>next month.
>
>
All right then, if people are O.K. with using 2.2, I'll get those
bindings into the binary pachage for svn-0.25.0. However, don't expect
me to track the current stable Python version in future. I upgrade when
I feel like it.
--
Brane Čibej <brane_at_xbc.nu> http://www.xbc.nu/brane/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Jul 9 23:24:08 2003