I think the same. Go for the current production version.
Florian
On Wed, 9 Jul 2003 14:30:18 +0100, Duncan Booth <duncan@rcp.co.uk> wrote:
> brane@xbc.nu wrote in news:1057754776.3f0c0e985adf7@www.xbc.nu:
>
>> Python bindings? Sure, no problem; they build on Windows, and they
>> (presumably) work on Windows. Er. Which version of Python did you have
>> in mind, by the way?
>>
>> Because the trouble is that bindings built for Python 2.2 won't work
>> wirh Pyton 2.1, or any other version, at least on Windows -- because
>> the names of the Python DLLs change between versions.
>
> Python 2.2 (actually 2.2.3) is the current production version. I would
> have thought it would be sufficient simply to track the production
> version, so build for 2.2 until sometime after 2.3 has come out. If
> anyone wants to use a beta they can probably be expected to build the
> bindings themselves, and if they have an older version of Python they
> should be encouraged to upgrade.
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Jul 9 17:40:50 2003