[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: CHANGES (take 2)

From: Bruce DeVisser <devisser_at_look.ca>
Date: 2003-07-04 06:03:44 CEST

On Thu, Jul 03, 2003 at 12:41:55PM -0400, pll@lanminds.com wrote:
> >>>>> On 3 Jul 2003, "Ben" == Ben Collins-Sussman wrote:
> Ben> I really like the fact that you've started a "new tradition":
> Ben> including revision numbers next to each bullet.
> Ben> But in the process, you've also lost a tradition:
> Ben> I'd rather not substitute revision numbers for issue numbers.
> Ben> Have both, if possible.
> I'll gladly attempt to have both where possible. The rev
> number is obviously easily attainable, whereas the issue
> number is not unless the committer mentions it in the log.

If you look at logs, everything looks like a revision;
whereas if you look at IZ, everything looks like an issue!
Both together should create a complete picture.

I'm not sure you can (or want to) boil every change down to
a single revision. There may be a one-to-many relationship
between issues and revisions, as some issues require a
number of nails before the coffin is considered shut for


To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Jul 4 06:06:20 2003

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.