On Thu, Jul 03, 2003 at 12:41:55PM -0400, pll@lanminds.com wrote:
> >>>>> On 3 Jul 2003, "Ben" == Ben Collins-Sussman wrote:
>
> Ben> I really like the fact that you've started a "new tradition":
> Ben> including revision numbers next to each bullet.
>
> Ben> But in the process, you've also lost a tradition:
>
> Ben> I'd rather not substitute revision numbers for issue numbers.
> Ben> Have both, if possible.
>
> I'll gladly attempt to have both where possible. The rev
> number is obviously easily attainable, whereas the issue
> number is not unless the committer mentions it in the log.
If you look at logs, everything looks like a revision;
whereas if you look at IZ, everything looks like an issue!
Both together should create a complete picture.
I'm not sure you can (or want to) boil every change down to
a single revision. There may be a one-to-many relationship
between issues and revisions, as some issues require a
number of nails before the coffin is considered shut for
good.
Bruce
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Jul 4 06:06:20 2003