Re: CHANGES (take 2)
From: <pll_at_lanminds.com>
Date: 2003-07-03 18:41:55 CEST
>>>>> On 3 Jul 2003, "Ben" == Ben Collins-Sussman wrote:
Ben> I bet 50% of that verbiage is kfogel describing all the changes
Upon looking at the logs, I actually noticed that the exact commits
But I also see his point that a) he's the only one really working on
Ben> In general, it's really hard to measure "code flux", and I
Fair enough, and I agree. I was just trying to figure out why I came
>>>>> On 3 Jul 2003, "Ben" == Ben Collins-Sussman wrote:
Ben> I really like the fact that you've started a "new tradition":
Ben> But in the process, you've also lost a tradition:
Ben> I'd rather not substitute revision numbers for issue numbers.
I'll gladly attempt to have both where possible. The rev number is
Incidently, the 'new' tradition was a complete accident. I didn't
-- Seeya, Paul -- Key fingerprint = 1660 FECC 5D21 D286 F853 E808 BB07 9239 53F1 28EE It may look like I'm just sitting here doing nothing, but I'm really actively waiting for all my problems to go away. If you're not having fun, you're not doing it right! --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.orgReceived on Thu Jul 3 18:43:35 2003 |
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.