[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svn versus cvs question

From: <kfogel_at_collab.net>
Date: 2003-06-25 17:01:35 CEST

Hans Kool <hans.kool@planet.nl> writes:
> What IMHO would be useful is a complete CVS wrapper, i.e. a way to
> transform CVS commands to SVN commands 'under water' so that tools
> that can use cvs can automatically also use svn. For example: Borland
> JBuilder integrates CVS support, but not SVN support (yet). If a
> wrapper existed then JBuilder could be made to believe to be
> interacting with CVS while in reality it would be interacting with SVN
> through it's CVS wrapper (facade).
>
> I am not sure if this is possible, but if such a tool existed it could
> help migration and adaptation of SVN very much. I know at least one
> person who would love it! :-)
>
> Can you tell me if you have foreseen in something like this to ease
> migration towards subversion?

The topic has come up before, but no one's written such a wrapper yet
as far as I know. Not sure how hard it would be; the mapping from CVS
to SVN is probably closer than the mapping from SVN to CVS, at least.

If you have a specific use in mind for such a wrapper, maybe you could
write it so that it satisfies that use, and then contribute it to the
tools/ area. Once it's started, other people might contribute more
compatibility...

-Karl

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Jun 25 17:50:42 2003

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.